Fallacy Forensics

In this series, we conduct forensic investigations of the logical fallacies, rhetorical tricks, and intellectual dishonesty deployed by today's most prominent commentators. From Ben Shapiro's rapid-fire Gish Gallops to Jordan Peterson's semantic fog, from Charlie Kirk's moving goalposts to the manufactured outrage of the pundit class—we meticulously examine the evidence, identify the techniques, and expose the manipulation. Each episode arms you with the tools to recognize these tactics in real-time. We name the fallacies. We explain how they work. We show you exactly why that "DESTROYED" moment was actually just smoke and mirrors. Because once you see the tricks, you can't unsee them. This isn't about left vs. right—it's about substance vs. sophistry. Whether it's a straw man, an ad hominem, or good old-fashioned gaslighting, we break down the bad faith arguments so you'll never fall for them again.

Curated by: Rationality Rules (47 videos)


Currently Playing: How to Beat Someone Who's "Just Asking Questions"

Go to https://ground.news/rationality to stay fully informed on breaking news, compare coverage and avoid media bias. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month. To support us on Patreon (thank you): https://www.patreon.com/rationalityrules Jordan Peterson hosted Destiny on his own podcast — in person, no moderator, no clock, home advantage entirely his. It didn't help. And the strangest part is where the trouble started: on the one topic the two of them completely agree about. Because the moment agreement threatens to break out, Peterson reaches for the move he's spent a decade perfecting. An enormous, frightening statistic, delivered with absolute confidence and no source. Homework for anyone who doubts it: "go look". And a conclusion that never quite gets said explicitly, just left hanging in the air, for the audience to finish on his behalf. In this breakdown, we watch the trick get built piece by piece, and then watch Destiny dismantle it with a question so simple it barely qualifies as a technique... yet it's the one thing this move cannot survive. And because homework was assigned, we did it: every number Peterson commits to gets checked against the actual data. It does not go well for him. By the end, you'll spot this move everywhere, and you'll know exactly what to ask the next person who tries it on you. To support us through PayPal (thank you): https://www.paypal.me/RationalityRules To visit the DEBUNKED card game website: https://www.debunkedcardgame.com/ To follow Steve on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RationalityRules To tweet with Steve on X: https://twitter.com/RationalityRule -- How to EXPOSE a Closet Fascist (my previous breakdown of this conversation): https://youtu.be/j2IDjYcm9Zo Streaming, Politics, & Philosophy | @destiny | EP 433: https://youtu.be/ycDUU1n2iEE Destiny's channel: https://www.youtube.com/@destiny


Tracks in this Playlist